China’s rising assertiveness in the South China Sea has provoked a concerted pushback from the United States and its key allies, with Japan and the United Kingdom lending their naval assets to recent stepped up maneuvers that have put the contested maritime region on a new edge.
The US military flew B-52 bombers close to the South China Sea earlier this week, a deployment US Pentagon spokesman Lieutenant Colonel Dave Eastburn claimed was a “regularly scheduled operation designed to enhance our interoperability with our partners and allies in the region.”
US Defense Secretary Jim Mattis, however, underscored the importance of the operation by emphasizing the threat posed by China’s recent militarization of disputed land features in the South China Sea. Some analysts believe China is arming up the features to establish a strategic aerial defense identification zone (ADIZ) over the waters.
“If that was 20 years ago and (China) had not militarized those features there, it would have just been another [routine] bomber on its way to Diego Garcia or whatever [in the Indo-Pacific area],” the American defense secretary told reports when asked about the relevance of the B-52 flyovers close to the contested areas.
Japan, a key US ally, has been among the major regional powers to take the lead against China, recently conducting (September 26) a high-profile joint naval exercise with the United Kingdom. The exercises in the Indian Ocean, en route to the South and East China Seas, involved Japan’s flagship warship, the giant Kaga helicopter carrier, the Japanese destroyer Inazuma and British frigate HMS Argyle.

Over the past month, Japan’s Marine Self-Defense Forces (JMSDF) armada has made port calls at various strategically situated countries, including the Philippines, Indonesia, Singapore, Sri Lanka and India.
En route to the Philippines from Japan, the Japanese helicopter carrier and two guided-missile destroyers this month held joint naval exercises with the US Navy’s Ronald Reagan aircraft carrier strike group.
The bilateral drills included joint maneuvering procedures, sailing in formation and replenishment-at-sea training, as well as the exchange of naval liaison officers. Sailing side-by-side, the two allies’ navies sent a muscular message of growing maritime cooperation against China’s recent moves to militarize and dominate the region.
The US-led counterbalance has so far been well-received in the region. Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte, known for his China-leaning diplomacy, conspicuously visited the Japanese helicopter carrier when it docked at his country’s Subic naval facility on September 1.
Local media portrayed Japan as a source of security and stability in the South China Sea’s tempestuous waters, where the Philippines and China are at loggerheads, including over the crucial Scarborough Shoal.

Beijing took administrative control of the feature situated in the Philippines’ exclusive economic zone (EEZ) after a months-long standoff in 2012. Analysts say the shoal will be a key link in the strategic chain if China eventually moves to enforce an ADIZ over the area.
To some, Duterte’s visit to the Japanese warship underscored the enduring influence of Tokyo as a key strategic partner to Southeast Asian countries, many of which are now starting to reevaluate their recently rising but historically up-and-down relations with China.
The UK, another top US strategic ally, has also stepped up its efforts to challenge China’s expansive claims in the South China Sea, a crucial waterway through which as much as US$5 trillion worth of global trade passes each year.
Last month, the UK’s Royal Navy’s HMS Albion, a 22,000-ton amphibious warship, sailed close to China’s claimed Paracel Islands in the area, features contested with Vietnam which Beijing has heavily militarized in recent years.

In April, Australian warships also sailed in the same contested area, which, according to Australian defense authorities, was part of efforts to “continue to exercise rights under international law to freedom of navigation and overflight, including in the South China Sea.”
Countering Chinese criticism of the move, then Australian Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull said the sail-by was “our perfect right in accordance with international law.”
A spokesman for the UK’s Royal Navy similarly defended the HMS Albion’s latest maneuver in the South China Sea as “exercise[ing] her rights for freedom of navigation in full compliance with international law and norms.”
China, however, has taken a tougher line against the UK’s freedom of navigation operations. It recently deployed a frigate and two helicopters to challenge the British warship, leading to a standoff that Beijing portrayed as a justified response to what it saw as a clear case of “provocation.”

China’s Foreign Ministry accused Britain of “infring[ing] on China’s sovereignty” and “strongly urge[d] the British side to immediately stop such provocative actions, to avoid harming the broader picture of bilateral relations and regional peace and stability. Beijing warned that it “will continue to take all necessary measures to defend its sovereignty and security.”
Beijing’s main mouthpiece newspaper the China Daily warned in a recent editorial that “[a]ny act that harms China’s core interests will only put a spanner in the works” towards a “top-notch” post-Brexit trade agreement between Beijing and London.
In a speech at the annual Induction Program for Commonwealth Diplomats last week, China’s Ambassador to the UK Liu Xiaoming focused his criticism on the US, accusing it and its allies of using “the excuse of so-called ‘freedom of navigation’” to “show off their military might” in a “serious infringement upon China’s sovereignty.”
He accused the West of putting “regional peace and stability in jeopardy” through its failure to “appreciate the peace and tranquility in the South China Sea.”

Ren Guoqiang, China’s defense ministry spokesman, adopted a similar line, arguing that thanks to “joint efforts of China and [Southeast Asian] countries, the situation in the South China Sea has been stabilized and maintains a positive momentum.”
The Chinese defense official accused “some countries outside this region” of “choos[ing] to ignore it and continue to send warships to the South China Sea to stir up trouble.” He said such moves threaten peace and go “against the collective will and efforts of the countries in this region.”
The US and its key allies, however, see China as a source of trouble and instability in the region, and are gradually forging a coalition of like-minded maritime powers to keep the maritime area free for all nations’, not just China’s, sailing vessels.

Russias economy is the size of new York city.. Hehehehe
And Chinas military is still a baby paper tiger compared to the US.
China should just respect international law and stop militarizing the sea..
But of course they won’t and it will lead to trouble..
Oh,really!
Oh,really!
Jo Kang China can now claim Pacific Ocean,Atlantic Ocean,indian ocean,north pole ,south pole and all the seas around on fictitious claims.ejo knows
Jo Kang China can now claim Pacific Ocean,Atlantic Ocean,indian ocean,north pole ,south pole and all the seas around on fictitious claims.ejo knows
Joe Wong lies lies
Joe Wong lies lies
Not true
Not true
Historically China’s might is right bullying of small weak nations in d area is d greedy trouble maker China not only infringe on ASEAN nations sovereign n territorial rights but illegally invaded n occupied n convert rock outcrops n destroys corrals turn it into its manmade
Military island outpost wtf! Like the Scarborough shoal in d West Philippine Sea it’s inside d Phil EEZ thick face sob China ignored shamelessly violating with impunity the UNCLOS where he is a signatory ! China violates all d international laws of s civilized world ! Status quo must preserve back remove Chinas artificial
Military outpost in the region now! !
Who will do this ?!? R u afraid of China ?!
china talks about stupidity
Jo Kang We all know that China occupied a territory that is not legally theirs. Philippines won the case against China.
Let peace prevail. The current tension among world power is reminiscent of the preceding world war two
Jo Kang really. I would call it bullying …
Jo Kang its just imposible to defend a thief dude.just get out of our area ang everything will be fine.GET OUT THIEF !
The reporter fails to point out the glaring omission – India. This was going to be the Quad but it’s only a threesome. Additionally it is poorly organized, Japan is part of BRI now and doing joint development projects with China in Vietnam, China just moved all its troops away from the disputed border area with India clearly indicating continued rapprochement. Even with a trillion dollars a year they can’t keep up with Russia and/or China largely because over half goes to corruption. Recent reports show that of the 11 or 12 aircraft carrier fleets none are combat ready and can not be readily deployed.(lack of funds was sighted.)
Is there anything more pathetic than a dying empire?
Joe Wong : Even the Vietnamese and Koreans don’t take your charges favorably. The North Koreans even kept a long distance from your communist China. Keep on charging, buddy, if it kept you happy.
Jo Kang : You did not understand the difference between high sea and territorial sea. If the South China Sea is part of the high seas, then the SCS belongs to all the nations in the world; it does not belong to any one nation as China. Therefore, all the nations have a right to take part to determine the fate of the SCS, not only a few in Asia.
Yes, Japan and every other nation have a claim or stake to the South China Sea. Even landlocked nations such as Bhutan, and remote nations such Argintina all have a claim or stake to the said sea. That is why in the eyes of the international community, the said sea is part of the high seas = international seas. It does not belong to any one nation such as China.
Jo Kang The issue they are negotiating is the issue they created. If you are defending that, then it is pretty obvious you are a retard lol