China's defense chief Wei Fenghe addresses the Shangri-La Dialogue meeting in Singapore, June 2, 2019. Photo: Simon Roughneen

Speaking at the Shangri-La Dialogue (SLD) on Sunday, Chinese Defense Minister Wei Fenghe made many bold, controversial remarks. One such statement was his assertion that since its founding in 1949, the People’s Republic of China “has never provoked a war or conflict, nor has it ever invaded another country or taken an inch of land from others.”

To portray the Asian behemoth as a benign, peace-loving country in his speech at the Singapore-based security conference, Wei also said: “History has proven and will continue to prove that China will not follow the beaten path of big powers seeking hegemony when it grows strong. Hegemony does not conform to China’s values and national interests.”

Such a portrayal of a benevolent, altruistic China has also been repeatedly painted by Xi Jinping in his international homilies. For instance, in his keynote speech at the United Nations Office in Geneva in 2017, Xi, China’s most powerful and authoritarian leader since Mao Zedong, pledged: “No matter how strong its economy grows, China will never seek hegemony, expansion or sphere of influence. History has borne this out and will continue to do so.”

Alas, when it comes to the South China Sea, history has shown that the one-party PRC has not practiced what Wei and Xi preached. It has even done the opposite of what they said.

In 1974, China launched a brief but violent attack on the Paracel Islands, then under the control of US-backed South Vietnam. Defeating the South Vietnamese navy, which was by then very weak, China seized the Paracels and has hitherto occupied the islands.

Though Vietnam still – and strongly – claims sovereignty over the Paracels, called Hoàng Sa in Vietnamese, the PRC has in recent years undertaken massive reclamation work on the islands and deployed anti-ship and surface-to-air missiles as well as fighter jets to the disputed archipelago. In May 2018, China released footage of an H-6K long-range bomber landing on Woody Island, the biggest island in the area, leading to the US and other countries, including Vietnam, to condemn such an aggressive move.

Research published in the Naval War College Review found that the ‘short but intense’ skirmish [in 1974] ‘was the first step in China’s decades-long effort to establish and expand its presence in the South China Sea’

A well-researched study published in 2016 said that the “hitherto-unknown details of the [1974] battle illustrate how Chinese strategists tailored their tactics so as to coerce, deter, and defeat a rival claimant in the South China Sea.” That research, published in the Naval War College Review, also found that the “short but intense” skirmish “was the first step in China’s decades-long effort to establish and expand its presence in the South China Sea.”

It then correctly pointed out a number of China’s expansionist and antagonistic moves in the area. These include its seizure of six reefs and atolls of the Spratly Islands after another skirmish with Vietnam at Johnson South Reef in 1988 and the 2012 standoff with the Philippines, which resulted in Beijing compelling Manila to yield control of Scarborough Shoal.

What’s more, since 2013, the Asian giant has conducted an enormous expansion in the Spratlys, building up artificial islands and then militarizing those man-made bases. It was reported in May last year that China had installed anti-ship cruise missiles and surface-to-air missiles on three of its artificial bases in the Spratlys, namely Mischief, Fiery and Subi reefs.

For the Philippines, China’s seizure of Scarborough Shoal in 2012 was the last straw, prompting it to launch an arbitration case against China in 2013. In a landmark verdict three years later, a United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) tribunal unanimously invalidated many of Beijing’s contentious statements and unlawful actions. These included The Hague-based court’s findings that “there was no legal basis for China to claim historic rights to resources” within its so-called “nine-dash line,” which covers almost all the South China Sea, and that it “violated the Philippines’ sovereign rights in its exclusive economic zone [EEZ]” by, among others, “constructing artificial islands.”

Yet China forcefully ignored the final and legally binding award and used its huge economic, political and military might to compel other countries and organizations to sideline the milestone verdict.

China has also utilized its new-found power to curtail and coerce its smaller neighbors’ commercial activities in the South China Sea. For example, it has frequently harassed and attacked Vietnamese fishermen. In 2017 and 2018, China pressured its southern communist neighbor, which it also invaded in the brief but bloody border war in 1979, to cease oil and gas exploration operations in the areas that lie within Vietnam’s 200-nautical-mile EEZ because those offshore fields are also near its controversial “nine-dash line.”

Amid its multi-front conflict with the US, the PRC has now appeared less aggressive than it was a few years ago – when, as US president Barack Obama said, the Asian country used its “sheer size and muscle” to push around smaller nations in the South China Sea or applied “the old style of might makes right, as opposed to working through international law and international norms to establish claims, and to resolve disputes.”

That said, China hasn’t abandoned its ultimate aim of controlling the resources-rich and strategically vital waterway. In its recently released New Indo-Pacific Strategy, the US Department of Defense is probably right to claim that China “is engaged in a campaign of low-level coercion to assert control of disputed spaces in the region, particularly in the maritime domain. China is using a steady progression of small, incremental steps in the ‘gray zone’ between peaceful relations and overt hostilities to secure its aims, while remaining below the threshold of armed conflict.”

In his speech at the Shangri-La security conference, Wei defended his country’s controversial construction and militarization in the 3.5-million-square-kilometer sea, stating: “It is the legitimate right of a sovereign state to carry out construction on its own territory. China built limited defense facilities on the islands and reefs for self-defense.”

But as ruled by the UNCLOS tribunal, China’s “nine-dash line” claim is invalid according to international law. And as that infamous line was declared illegal by the international tribunal, many, if not most, of China’s contentious actions within it, including its land reclamation and military buildup, are also illegal.

It’s worth noting that the Chinese defense minister mentioned “international law” only once in his SLD speech, when he referred to the United States’ 1979 Taiwan Relations Act, asking: “Is it of Taiwan or the US? Is it a Chinese law or an international law?” That means, he didn’t mention international law when he talked about the South China Sea issue.

Other South China Sea claimants, including Vietnam, and many other nations, such as the US, Japan, India, Australia and Singapore, or outsiders, such as the United Kingdom and the European Union, have long called for disputing states to clarify their maritime claims according to international law

Other South China Sea claimants, including Vietnam, and many other nations, such as the US, Japan, India, Australia and Singapore, or outsiders, such as the United Kingdom and the European Union, have long called for disputing states to clarify their maritime claims according to international law.

In his remarks at the Group of Seven summit in Canada in 2017, Donald Tusk, president of the European Council, urged the G7 states (France, Germany, Italy, the UK, the US, Canada and Japan) to “demonstrate unity regarding the ongoing land reclamation and militarization in the South China Sea, as international law must apply to all countries, big and small, on land and at sea.”

China has still strongly objected to an international-law-based approach to the maritime dispute because adopting such an approach would mean it has to abandon its “nine-dash line” claim.

In his address, Wei Fenghe claimed that before the Shangri-La Dialogue, he visited Vietnam and “reached broad consensus” with his Vietnamese counterpart, General Ngo Xuan Lich, “on maintaining the stability in the South China Sea.”

Speaking shortly after the Chinese defense chief on Sunday, while stressing that “maintaining peace and cooperation is in common interest of the two nations and in fact the whole region”, Lich revealed that he and Wei “met to agree that Vietnam and China have differences in the East Sea [Vietnam’s name for the South China Sea] issues.”

In his remarks, Vietnam’s top military officer likewise stressed that the region and the world at large are “faced with security challenges and complexities” and listed “causes to such a situation.” These include “the mismatch between words and deeds, the behavior of power politics [and] the mentality of ‘might is right’.” Although Lich didn’t mention China or any country, China’s claims and actions in the South China Sea were probably, if not certainly, in his mind when he prepared and made such remarks.

In a keynote speech at the Singapore Lecture in 2016, Tran Dai Quang, then Vietnam’s president, said “the world is faced also with many grave difficulties and challenges,” including territorial and maritime disputes, and warned: “The seriousness of these challenges is extremely worrying as long as the ‘might makes right’ mindset and the resort to the use of force still exist.”

Again, though Quang did not mention China or any other country by name, his remarks were aimed at Beijing’s aggressive activities in the South China Sea and its might-makes-right approach to the maritime disputes in particular.

Speaking at the opening ceremony of this year’s SLD, Lee Hsien Loong spoke quite diplomatically, if not positively, about China, leading Beijing to voice its appreciation of the Singaporean prime minister publicly.

Still, in his remarks, Lee gave Beijing a lot of advice on how to deal with some of its major national, regional and international matters. For example, with regard to the China Sea disputes, he rightly and frankly opined: “China should resolve these disputes peacefully, in accordance with international law, including UNCLOS. It should do so through diplomacy and compromise rather than force or the threat of force, while giving weight to the core interests and rights of other countries.

“Then over time it will build its reputation as a responsible and benevolent power that need not be feared. Instead China will be respected as a power that can be relied on to support a stable and peaceful region,” the Singaporean leader added.

By giving such advice implicitly, yet pointedly, Lee implied that at the moment, China doesn’t want to settle the maritime disputes peacefully, in accordance with international law, nor is it seen as “a responsible and benevolent power” in the region.

Indeed, when it comes to the South China Sea, China’s nice words are fundamentally at odds with its aggressive deeds.

Join the Conversation


  1. This is the right blog for anyone who wants to find out about this topic. You realize so much its almost hard to argue with you (not that I actually would want…HaHa). You definitely put a new spin on a topic thats been written about for years. Great stuff, just great!

  2. Somebody necessarily lend a hand to make severely articles I would state. This is the very first time I frequented your web page and to this point? I amazed with the analysis you made to make this particular post amazing. Excellent activity!

  3. Hello there, simply became alert to your weblog thru Google, and located that it is truly informative. I am gonna be careful for brussels. I’ll appreciate when you proceed this in future. A lot of other folks can be benefited out of your writing. Cheers!

  4. Hello just wanted to give you a quick heads up. The text in your article seem to be running off the screen in Ie. I’m not sure if this is a formatting issue or something to do with internet browser compatibility but I figured I’d post to let you know. The design look great though! Hope you get the issue fixed soon. Many thanks

  5. Thanks for another informative site. Where else could I get that type of information written in such a perfect way? I’ve a project that I am just now working on, and I have been on the look out for such info.

  6. I was wondering if you ever considered changing the structure of your blog? Its very well written; I love what youve got to say. But maybe you could a little more in the way of content so people could connect with it better. Youve got an awful lot of text for only having one or 2 images. Maybe you could space it out better?

  7. I haven’t checked in here for a while since I thought it was getting boring, but the last few posts are good quality so I guess I’ll add you back to my daily bloglist. You deserve it my friend 🙂

  8. naturally like your website however you need to check the spelling on several of your posts. A number of them are rife with spelling issues and I in finding it very troublesome to inform the truth nevertheless I will certainly come back again.

  9. I will immediately snatch your rss feed as I can not find your e-mail subscription hyperlink or e-newsletter service. Do you’ve any? Please allow me know so that I may just subscribe. Thanks.

  10. I’m not sure where you are getting your information, but great topic. I needs to spend some time learning much more or understanding more. Thanks for fantastic information I was looking for this information for my mission.

  11. I have not checked in here for some time because I thought it was getting boring, but the last few posts are good quality so I guess I’ll add you back to my everyday bloglist. You deserve it my friend 🙂

  12. I do not usually post any forms of making side money, but now will make an exemption. Check out that affiliate program: . I started around 4 weeks back and I’m already getting roughly $4000 every 30 days – all that by participating on blogs with referal link. Very easy income that you can do literally at home. Register there and post your thoughts here, so others might see it’s genuine program. Cheers.

  13. You really make it seem so easy with your presentation but I find this matter to be really something that I think I would never understand. It seems too complicated and extremely broad for me. I am looking forward for your next post, I’ll try to get the hang of it!

  14. Howdy! I know this is kinda off topic nevertheless I’d figured I’d ask. Would you be interested in trading links or maybe guest authoring a blog post or vice-versa? My website covers a lot of the same topics as yours and I think we could greatly benefit from each other. If you happen to be interested feel free to shoot me an email. I look forward to hearing from you! Excellent blog by the way!

  15. I must convey my passion for your kindness in support of all those that have the need for assistance with this particular niche. Your very own commitment to getting the solution along appeared to be extremely powerful and has continually encouraged women much like me to realize their objectives. Your amazing interesting information can mean a lot a person like me and further more to my peers. Many thanks; from all of us.

  16. Hey I am so thrilled I found your blog page, I really found you by accident, while I was looking on Digg for something else, Anyhow I am here now and would just like to say kudos for a remarkable post and a all round interesting blog (I also love the theme/design), I don’t have time to read it all at the minute but I have book-marked it and also added in your RSS feeds, so when I have time I will be back to read a lot more, Please do keep up the great work.

  17. I discovered your weblog site on google and verify a few of your early posts. Proceed to maintain up the very good operate. I just extra up your RSS feed to my MSN News Reader. Seeking ahead to reading more from you in a while!…

  18. hey there and thank you for your information – I have certainly picked up anything new from right here. I did however expertise a few technical points using this website, since I experienced to reload the site many times previous to I could get it to load properly. I had been wondering if your hosting is OK? Not that I’m complaining, but slow loading instances times will very frequently affect your placement in google and could damage your high quality score if ads and marketing with Adwords. Well I am adding this RSS to my email and could look out for a lot more of your respective fascinating content. Ensure that you update this again very soon..

  19. hello there and thank you to your info – I’ve definitely picked up something new from proper here. I did then again expertise several technical issues the usage of this web site, as I skilled to reload the site a lot of times previous to I could get it to load properly. I were brooding about in case your hosting is OK? Now not that I am complaining, however slow loading circumstances occasions will very frequently have an effect on your placement in google and can damage your high quality score if ads and ***********|advertising|advertising|advertising and *********** with Adwords. Anyway I am including this RSS to my email and could look out for a lot extra of your respective intriguing content. Make sure you replace this once more very soon..

  20. Hi there! This is kind of off topic but I need some guidance from an established blog. Is it difficult to set up your own blog? I’m not very techincal but I can figure things out pretty quick. I’m thinking about making my own but I’m not sure where to start. Do you have any points or suggestions? With thanks

  21. Thanks for another informative website. The place else could I get that type of information written in such an ideal method? I’ve a undertaking that I’m just now working on, and I’ve been at the glance out for such information.

  22. I’d have to examine with you here. Which is not one thing I usually do! I take pleasure in reading a post that may make folks think. Additionally, thanks for permitting me to comment!

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *