China's Yang Jiechi speaks at the Munich Security Conference on February 16. Beijing sees the INF treaty as unfair given most of its missiles are land-based. Photo: AFP / Thomas Kienzle

China has dismissed German Chancellor Angela Merkel’s proposal to “multilateralize” the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) treaty, whose survival is threatened by apparently irreconcilable geostrategic differences between the United States and Russia.

The bilateral arms control pact, which the US and the Soviet Union inked in 1987, prevents the two countries from manufacturing and deploying land-based missiles with a range between 500 and 5,500 kilometers. The Chinese have made it clear that they do not intend to reduce their arsenal of medium- and intermediate-range projectiles, saying it would unfairly weaken China’s defenses.

What they have not said, however, is that their participation in negotiations on a new, expanded INF agreement could also go against the one-China principle – that there is only one China, and Taiwan must be part of it.

Expanding the treaty

US President Donald Trump announced earlier this month that his country would pull out of the INF treaty in six months unless the Russians stopped violating it. The US government accuses Russia of producing and installing the Novator 9M729 land-based cruise missile, which exceeds the INF limitations.

The Kremlin denied any violation and replied that it would withdraw from the treaty in six months as well. For Russian President Vladimir Putin, the US has violated the INF legal framework by positioning Aegis Ashore anti-missile batteries in Romania. Moscow says this system has a launcher that can fire both interceptors and Tomahawk intermediate missiles.

Demonstrators pose as Russian leader Vladimir Putin and US President Donald Trump face off with model rockets in a square in Berlin amid debate over the demise of the INF treaty. Photo: AFP / Paul Zinken / Dpa

Merkel launched the idea of a global arms control deal last week, during the annual Munich Security Conference. She said the INF treaty’s demise could spark a new arms race. In her opinion, China should be part of a new agreement, given its growing missile might.

Chinese State Councillor Yang Jiechi was quick to reject Merkel’s suggestion. He said in Munich that China’s missiles were defensive in nature and did not pose a threat to any other nation.

Yang’s argument was backed up by retired Chinese general Yao Yunzhu at the same venue. Yao noted that China was a continental power and most of its strike capability was land-based, while the US and Russia had an incomparable advantage with their air- and sea-launched missiles. She said that her country’s signing of a multilateral INF deal would create a big asymmetry in capacities – to China’s detriment.

The Chinese state tabloid Global Times was adamant that “although China is now much stronger than it was in the past, its nuclear power and comprehensive military strength are far from being equal to those of the US.” In other words, the Chinese believe they cannot hold negotiations on the INF issue on an equal basis with Washington (and Moscow).

For Trump, the INF treaty favors China, which has a significant arsenal of medium-range and intermediate-range cruise and ballistic missiles.

Negotiating with Taiwan?

Jens Stoltenberg, the secretary general of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, said recently that while the current INF arrangement had to be preserved, the international community should look into possible ways to strengthen and expand it.

A Nato source told Asia Times that the alliance saw reasons to try to broaden the INF treaty to include more actors, because since the agreement was signed over 30 years ago, many countries had heavily invested in medium-range and intermediate-range platforms. Aside from China, countries such as India, Pakistan and Iran were developing and deploying INF assets.

Taiwan has positioned or is developing ground-based missiles covered by the INF treaty too. According to the Center for Strategic and International Studies, the Hsiung Feng IIE land-attack cruise missile has a range of 600 kilometers. The island is also producing a variant of this projectile, the Hsiung Feng IIER, that can hit a target as far as 1,250 km away.

Taiwan’s National Chung-Shan Institute of Science and Technology is also said to be working on a surface-to-surface, supersonic cruise missile. The Yun Feng is believed to have a range between 1,200 and 2,000 km.

Concentrating resources on missile development, the island is improving its ability to strike targets deep into mainland China, also making it a legitimate stakeholder in any possible multilateral debate about the reduction of medium- and intermediate-range projectiles.

This is obviously unacceptable to China, which regards the island as a rebel province and has not ruled out retaking it by force in the future. Indeed, Chinese leaders will never sit with their Taiwanese counterparts at the same table discussing a multilateral arms treaty (or any other international issue), because it would be equivalent to diplomatic recognition.

Against this backdrop, it seems quite evident that any attempt to save the INF pact by involving China is a non-starter.

Asia Times Financial is now live. Linking accurate news, insightful analysis and local knowledge with the ATF China Bond 50 Index, the world's first benchmark cross sector Chinese Bond Indices. Read ATF now. 

Join the Conversation

954 Comments

  1. Los Palladium Hotels & Resorts le ofrecen todas las facilidades y servicios para hacer de su estancia un recuerdo inmejorable: servicio de recepción 24 horas, servicio de teléfono y fax, conexión ADSL con cargo, TV por satélite, consigna para equipaje, servicio despertador, cambio de moneda, servicio de lavandería, parking exterior, rampas de acceso para minusválidos en las zonas comunes y piscinas , máquinas de refrescos, máquina de hielo, entre otros.

  2. El Servicio de emergencia se prestará prioritariamente dentro de la respectiva zona de influencia determinada por el centro de venta al que pertenezca el grupo de Técnicos asignados. Teniendo en cuenta que el Servicio de emergencia es una actividad a prestar al cliente, los Técnicos implicados en este Servicio serán determinados por las Jefaturas sobre la base de los conocimientos técnicos de sus integrantes y la implicación habitual en los clientes instalaciones que conduzca a una mayor efectividad de este Servicio. La Empresa facilitará la formación necesaria a sus integrantes con objeto de garantizar la mayor calidad y efectividad de este Servicio.

  3. Sólo he tenido que llamar una vez al servicio técnico porque me cargué un puerto usb y ya estando fuera de garantía: Fueron muy amables, me pidieron el código postal para recomendarme tiendas cercanas para que comparara los precios. Tal como le pasó a LEANLO, me compré un Sony Vaio plateado en septiembre de 2011 y ayer, estuve en El Corte Inglés, porque me lo compré allí, pensando (ingenua de mi) que me daba más garantía el comprarlo allí. Se lo llevaron a su servicio técnico porque no encendía nada de nada antes de los 2 años de compra, en otro país y es lo que había. Asociaciones : Femeval, Tecnifuego – Aespi, Cepreven, Aerme, Acvirme, Apici y Aseif.

  4. La ISO 9001:2008 es la base del sistema de gestion de la calidad ya que es una norma internacional y que se centra en todos los elementos de administración de calidad con los que una empresa debe contar para tener un sistema efectivo que le permita administrar y mejorar la calidad de sus productos servicios.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *